3 ms·
This is very feel good but falls short of making an actual point. > The hypothetical homogeneous group 'they' you refer to doesn't exist They do exist. Making
by BoorishBears 5y ago
This is very feel good but falls short of making an actual point.
> The hypothetical homogeneous group 'they' you refer to doesn't exist
They do exist. Making wrong statements with conviction doesn't make it true.
You can look Chromebook sales figures, you can look at the best selling laptops at major retailers, you can look at what's driving record laptop sales, look at price points that are soaring, look at the mobile space...
-
> It's billions of people and 'they' feel many ways.
Which is why we draw conclusions based on a large sample size like I did above. You're never going to be able to consider billions of points of view, so yes, you need to try and find the common thread in their preferences and usages.
-
> By painting with a common brush, you shut down discussions of what could be and encourage fence sitters to give up.
No, by painting with a common brush, you can have actual useful discussions about the reality of things, rather than espousing your own personal whims.
-
> Let's talk about why it's possible, easy to do, and how to do it.
a) Where did my comment say it's impossible?
b) It's not easy to do or it wouldn't have existed in the first place. The whole point of my comment is saying that you need to figure out how to do it taking the current reality of things into context.
If the world thought how HN does we'd already have bills banning IME and PSB. So it doesn't. You can't pretend that people actually are a little nudge away from caring about this, or you'll quickly find that you're wrong and nothing will have actually changed.
-
> The more fence sitters you convince that things are possible, pushes the fence further and further towards the other side.
Again, what you could do if you believed that fence sitters were some large portion of laptop buyers is do what I've done, show some indications of this. Show us how niche efforts aimed at power users aren't the only rumblings about how awful locked down computing is.
What you're doing is still painting a group with a large brush, except you're not even showing us where you got the paint.
- fartcannon 5y agoHuh? I like your ideas, but I'm not painting. I'm saying "don't paint". If you think of it like a nice dividing line through the people who think stuff can change and the people who don't, the folks on the line are 'on the fence'. You see? If you can convince a few of them (not large swathes of them, just a few), then the line shifts. If we all do that, we can change a lot of minds for good! You get what I mean? So yeah, my recommendation is that we all talk like things are easy to make better, instead of saying, "too late its all over" because you'll encourage more people to try which I assume you agree is a good thing but if not, I guess to each their own.
- BoorishBears 5y agoI'm saying you're painting though, and I'm saying you can't talk like things are easy to get better and have a meaningful conversation. Instead of trying to act like most people will ever care about locked bootloaders and PSB style co-processors, why don't we accept that they don't, they won't, and see what can happen from there? An example of that is looking at it from a national security perspective. If you can paint it as a vulnerability to the tech industry you could see movement without the sisyphean task of convincing people that this stuff matters in their day-to-day lives
- fartcannon 5y agoInteresting! I have to disagree that it can't lead to a meaningful conversation, but I'm definitely on board with painting it as a tech vulnerability!