3 ms·
You are straw-manning the argument as being simpler than it really is. Moderna for example states in their documentation that their vaccine was tested and activ
by gjsman-1000 5y ago
You are straw-manning the argument as being simpler than it really is. Moderna for example states in their documentation that their vaccine was tested and actively developed with fetus cell lines that were taken (likely from abortion) far back in the 1960s, making taking that vaccine a possible complicity with "Thou shalt not kill." As an example of one argument. My point is that it is not as simple as you think.
- ceph_ 5y agoUnder that same argument, those people should avoid goods transported by truck because trucks kill thousands of people per year and they would be complicit. You're just trying to keep up the lie that it's about religion at all. There are plenty of people in this thread openly admitting it's not about that, and they just don't feel like they should have to get the vax.
- gjsman-1000 5y agoFor my vaccine-hesitant family members, I can guarantee you it is about religion. The world is a lot broader than Hacker News. Also, there is a difference between something that could cause death, and something that already has from people who were defenseless, but I don't want to get into the whole argument here.