> This seems to rely on the assumption that Unix was the best approach for OSes one could do in 1980 Why do you think that? > [think] beyond Unix as the lowes

> This seems to rely on the assumption that Unix was the best approach for OSes one could do in 1980 Why do you think that? > [think] beyond Unix as the lowest common denominator in thinking about OSes? If it's the lowest common denominator, then it's probably not the "best approach", but rather an adequate one?