3 ms·
Certainly, but no more tiresome than the existing C syntax for function pointers, to which they were direct analogues.
by bangonkeyboard 5y ago
Certainly, but no more tiresome than the existing C syntax for function pointers, to which they were direct analogues.
- b3morales 5y agoYes, agreed absolutely. I think they'd be used more heavily because of the convenience of allowing captures, though.