4 ms·

There's shit developers everywhere. No need to call out people from a specific culture as being worse on average.

• Jensson 5y ago
  Nobody said that Indian developers are worse than average. Just that there is a big difference if you take cheap Indian developers instead of expensive Indian developers in terms of cost per head, which is why you say that you picked the cheapest Indian developers. Not sure why you would read that as if Indian developers are worse, it is really hard to read it that way. I guess people here just react because it is fun to react, but it really just reads as if they picked the cheapest among Indians and no how Indians relates to other groups at all. And by Indian developers most likely they meant developers stationed in India and not ethnic group, as location is the main degerminator of cost. So the description was for the cheapest developers you can find in India.
  • PieUser 5y ago
    > No need to call out people from a specific culture as being worse on average. Agreed, it would've been fine if they just left out "Indians" and "Western" the original comment.
    • Jensson 5y ago
      But then the running cost wouldn't make sense. The cost of having 200 tech people around is way above $5 million if most of them aren't stationed in a low cost country like India.
• deleted 5y ago
  [deleted]