3 ms·
It isn't. It shows you different points of view than the ones you read online or hear on TV. Plus the burden of proof is on the scientists and as OP said, they
by Bancakes 5y ago
It isn't. It shows you different points of view than the ones you read online or hear on TV. Plus the burden of proof is on the scientists and as OP said, they did not cite/refute any specific misinformation.
I'm nit defending Rogan but I am defending my ability to get all viewpoints I can.
- fer 5y agoJoe Rogan has steered from doing light-hearted interviews to notable individuals to offering pre-chewed, easy-to-digest, sometimes-factual, no-opposing-view interviews on complex and controversial issues. Somehow Malone didn't have time to put on a paper the claims that got him banned from Twitter. That should be enough food for thought about such claims. > they did not cite/refute any specific misinformation. It's an open letter, not a rebuttal. Google Malone fact check for rebuttals, focus only on those by other experts if you want. I just gave above one piece of misinformation that literally kills children, it's easy to verify.