4 ms·
> Of course they're text. What else could they possibly be? Symbols. > As for going beyond text, it becomes difficult to coordinate richer types of files betw
by badsectoracula 5y ago
> Of course they're text. What else could they possibly be?
Symbols.
> As for going beyond text, it becomes difficult to coordinate richer types of files between different groups
Well, yeah, the reason why we focus on Unix as a lowest common denominator for OSes, text files as the best way to store code, etc isn't because they are objectively superior to everything else, but because they are things that were good enough and existed earlier enough to gain approval and have people learn and rely on them.
But while this is a practical concern, that doesn't mean we can't think of alternatives. Perhaps with a stroke of luck or the right circumstances (e.g. some new type of platform) it could even catch on.
- dragonwriter 5y ago> > Of course they're text. What else could they possibly be? > Symbols. That would be a sensible response in the world where text and symbols were mutually exclusive, rather than the former being a subset of the latter.
- pasquinelli 5y agoif text is a subset of symbols then there are symbols that aren't text. if you mean to say that symbols are a subset of text, then that is simply confusion.