3 ms·
Given that Tesla's default strategy when confronted with defects is to deny and deflect, why would they want to pay their software developers to build systems t
by teraflop 5y ago
Given that Tesla's default strategy when confronted with defects is to deny and deflect, why would they want to pay their software developers to build systems that reliably collect evidence of defects?
- cromka 5y ago> would they want to pay their software developers to build systems that reliably collect evidence of defects? The point was this would be picked up by the regular KPIs collected, not something that would specifically curate to failures. Think: temperature of each wheel, deceleration rate (of each wheel, again), the ESP feedback (the car would inevitably shift when breaking and so ESP would continuously kick-in to compensate), and so on. This is probably very easily detectable by the software without having to specifically design it for it.