2 ms·
https://armypubs.army.mil/epubs/DR_pubs/DR_a/ARN32974-ATP_3-90.5-000-WEB-1.pdf https://armypubs.army.mil/epubs/DR_pubs/DR_a/ARN32974-ATP_3-... That's a lot of
by dragontamer 5y ago
https://armypubs.army.mil/epubs/DR_pubs/DR_a/ARN32974-ATP_3-90.5-000-WEB-1.pdf https://armypubs.army.mil/epubs/DR_pubs/DR_a/ARN32974-ATP_3-...
That's a lot of information about the nitty-gritty of IFVs (aka: M2 Bradley).
Weapons discussions are always relevant to the realm of tactics, of which the US Army absolutely makes detailed discussions and manuals about.
------
In any case, the field manual absolutely cares about the 25mm to 30mm cannon on the M2 Bradley / IFV platform. The "Combined Arms" battalions follow this guidance, to maximize the amount of uncertainty the opponent faces on the battlefield.
These details matter. And I'm almost certain that the "Laser" weapon will be seen in some kind of light akin to this theory.