3 ms·
> all it does is assert that Malone's positions are wrong and dangerous. Are they? Yes. To point one not directly related to COVID/vaccines, I was particularl
by fer 5y ago
> all it does is assert that Malone's positions are wrong and dangerous. Are they?
Yes.
To point one not directly related to COVID/vaccines, I was particularly surprised by his claims that strokes in children are zero (and that basically all paediatric strokes are caused by COVID vaccines).
In actual paediatric medicine, stroke is among the top 10 causes of death in children, precisely because people think it doesn't happen, so even though the symptoms are well known, the required medical attention is fatally delayed.
- drcongo 5y agoOP could probably have looked that up for themselves if they actually wanted to know who is wrong. Sadly Rogan's show is perfectly pitched at the wilfully ignorant.
- Bancakes 5y agoIt isn't. It shows you different points of view than the ones you read online or hear on TV. Plus the burden of proof is on the scientists and as OP said, they did not cite/refute any specific misinformation. I'm nit defending Rogan but I am defending my ability to get all viewpoints I can.
- fer 5y agoJoe Rogan has steered from doing light-hearted interviews to notable individuals to offering pre-chewed, easy-to-digest, sometimes-factual, no-opposing-view interviews on complex and controversial issues. Somehow Malone didn't have time to put on a paper the claims that got him banned from Twitter. That should be enough food for thought about such claims. > they did not cite/refute any specific misinformation. It's an open letter, not a rebuttal. Google Malone fact check for rebuttals, focus only on those by other experts if you want. I just gave above one piece of misinformation that literally kills children, it's easy to verify.