> Does the math here make zero sense? It does, if you read what I wrote. 1 mac + 10 win + 1 linux + 10 win = 1 mac + 1 linux + 20 windows = 4.5% mac + 4.5% lin

> Does the math here make zero sense? It does, if you read what I wrote. 1 mac + 10 win + 1 linux + 10 win = 1 mac + 1 linux + 20 windows = 4.5% mac + 4.5% linux + 91% windows. > this would almost seem to be in favour of windows users since they're relative userbase increases enough to outset surges If you read it as numbers, yes. But the point is that certain things cannot be expressed in numbers. Because the mac/linux userbase is composed disproportionately more of power-users, who have disproportionately more clout among their network of acquaintances when it comes to IT and games, their overall influence is much higher than the numbers convey. They start the chains. Your statement on not feeling this or that, btw, is directly negated by the very history of HumbleBundle. > Why would developers want to support a userbase We are not talking about developers here, but distributors. > Every algorithmic recommendation engine is trying to represent virality and clout That doesn't mean they succeed, and regardless, we are not talking about social media here. You seem to have gone off on a series of rants without actually reading what I wrote.