3 ms·
Note that you specific left out the contextual clue where I said "In my experience" that is not how it's used in practice as an immediate follow-up to that sent
by bumby 5y ago
Note that you specific left out the contextual clue where I said "In my experience" that is not how it's used in practice as an immediate follow-up to that sentence about how it's used. I am not making a general case, but talking specifically about safety-critical code from the very start. I am not saying everyone must use my definition in the general case. I'm saying in the very specific subset of cases, there is an objective definition for good reason.
Let me try a different tack to see if we can get off this pedantic merry-go-round. You've agreed that cognitive biases affect decision-making. So let's say as a developer you are working on safety-critical code that is in danger of being over schedule and over budget. Their manager says if the project isn't successful, your company will lose future work to a competitor and that might leave you out of a job. But if it is delivered on time, you're company will get a massive windfall in terms of future contracts and profits, and likely lead you to a big promotion. What do you do to ensure those cognitive biases do not influence you to incorrectly discount risks and ship the software early before the risks are properly addressed?
(Btw, it's a really bad method of communicating to use absolute terms like 'everyone'. For one, it makes it look like you think you're smarter than you are and more importantly, it's easily falsifiable. That type of communication belongs more on r/iamverysmart than HN)