5 ms·

Yes, but the coverage numbers look great!

• arcticbull 5y ago
  Don’t even get me started on that as a metric lol. I will say going from 0-20% coverage is a lot more valuable than going from 70-90%
  • smaudet 5y ago
    The proper metric is tests/feature - most test code bases are so bad you can't even pick out what feature is being tested, due to a blind adherence to 'code coverage' It is the equivalent of spot checking a road 100 times for cracks but forgetting to make sure you put up stop signs at the intersections - I honestly believe if you are a tech lead or boss advocating this you should be fired on the spot for encouraging dangerous and malignant practices...