So with a sample of 1 you declare another sample of 1 as false with enough confidence for an online press release. I don't know, this kind of statement does not

So with a sample of 1 you declare another sample of 1 as false with enough confidence for an online press release. I don't know, this kind of statement does not sound right to me. I would expect for plenty of samples of 1 to be different unless I can be sure the distribution of possible results is really narrow and limited. Both cats and the context (how long were they out, when was the last meal - digesting creates heat, how cold is it, etc.) have quite a large number of possibilities.