4 ms·
It's not as easy as faking metadata of 5* user ratings of your own content. If it ever was, that technique is no longer useful and likely to lead to losing rank
by tweetle_beetle 5y ago
It's not as easy as faking metadata of 5* user ratings of your own content. If it ever was, that technique is no longer useful and likely to lead to losing rank.
Google uses a subset of schema.org, validates it according to its own stricter specification and extends it in other ways. It doesn't naively consume everything you provide. For example [1]
> If the Recipe structured data contains a single review, the reviewer's name must be a valid person or organization. For example, "50% off ingredients" is not a valid name for a reviewer.
> Warning: If your site violates one or more of these guidelines, then Google may take manual action against it. Once you have remedied the problem, you can submit your site for reconsideration.
[1] https://developers.google.com/search/docs/advanced/structured-data/review-snippet#guidelines https://developers.google.com/search/docs/advanced/structure...
- dillondoyle 5y agoMakes sense. And I'm sure they don't want to give too much away just helps SEO spammers even more