Comparing Eugene's exploit to a decentralized root owned by the commons that complements ICANN's system is confusing to me. I can understand how his exploit co

Comparing Eugene's exploit to a decentralized root owned by the commons that complements ICANN's system is confusing to me. I can understand how his exploit could be a formative experience for you, what I can't understand is how that experience relates to Handshake. What you're saying is like, "imagine if a security researcher decided he was tired of getting paid much less than he deserves and decides to hack a bank," and then using this imagined experience as a "logical" reason to hold disdain for something. You're welcome to your opinion, but please stop trying to paint a false picture about Handshake specifically unless you're using actual facts that are real life and not imagined.