8 ms·
New theory proposes ‘forgetting’ is a form of learning
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]
- hypertele-Xii 5y agoThe heaviest alcohol drinkers in my society are university students. Seems like a correlation.
- loceng 5y agoMay be important to note that "hyper indoctrination" vs. memorizing too much at once leads to rigidity or inefficiency and recall - and so breaking down those walls a bit may allow info to be more easily accessed; e.g. alcohol makes someone "looser" - their stable pathways for memorization that have been developed over an open mind (neural network) vs. critical thinking development [where there aren't lists to memorize but you're exposed instead to concepts, patterns, and frameworks - and naturally you remember automatically because there's enough interest when you're reading it (and strength of importance derived from the underlying interconnectivity/passion, vs. forcing yourself to memorize because it's on a test).
- kvgr 5y agoAnd people with PTSD and anxiety have problem with sorting what to forget. It may be just that troubled mind cannot forget because it thinks that this one bad thing is important, even when in grand scheme of things it isn’t. Maybe that is why psychedelics help people with ptsd, it rewires the importance of memories. Just my drunken 2c.
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]
- philipov 5y agoThat's great. I've always thought forgetting was a key part of learning. When you are learning something, you pick up a lot of bad habits. Part of learning is forgetting those bad habits so they don't override the good habits. This is why you want to start slowly and work up to a faster speed, so you can make sure you're practicing good habits. If you try to go fast at the start, you will be going too fast to control what you're doing and will drill bad habits into your muscle memory instead. It can be really hard to get rid of those bad habits after they've cemented.
- nathias 5y agoExactly, I have noticed this same pattern and came to the same conclusions, but not only are you forgetting the 'bad habits' you're also integrating micro habits/skills into more general ones with this same process. In short: adding noise to noise/signal ratio can enhance the type and strength of signal.
- michaelrpeskin 5y agoYes. An old weightlifting coach I had would say this. Every time you practice a lift you do some of the “right” things every time. And some of the “wrong” things too. But there are many more ways to be wrong than right so the right things start to reinforce. And then you take a break and your body starts to forget the movements. But the diffusely learned wrong things dissipate faster so you’re left with more right than wrong. Over many cycles of this you learn the right way to perform the movements.
- ravenstine 5y agoI wonder if this is related to the effect of being better at something after not doing it for a while. When it comes to a lot of things I do repetitively, I notice that there comes a point where either my skill doesn't improve or I actually get worse at what I'm doing. Then I'll take a day or more off, and when I come back suddenly I'm a total boss. The brain probably needs rest time to throw out the bad input and that can't happen as much during execution.
- zwkrt 5y agoAn old mentor of mine once said some thing I found very profound: “Learning is like eating; you can choose what you consume. But knowing is like digesting; it will happen regardless, and in its own time. You only have control over eating, so eat well and frequently” There’s really a little leap of faith any time we want to learn something, because we don’t actually control how or when it fits into our brain or body, just that if we keep trying that it will.
- 11thEarlOfMar 5y agoI frequently find myself contributing to conversations with knowledge that I don't recall specifically learning. Once in a while, I think "Wow, how did I come up with something that insightful? When did I ever learn that?" It seems there's a background activity in the mind that is actually synthesizing a wide variety of inputs from our environment. As in what I read, movies I watch, meetings I sit in on, Tweets that transpire, hikes I take, visits to distant cities, and so on. In many cases, it seems the connections and support for ideas, notions and realizations that then become knowledge are made without explicitly reasoning through them. I'd say this happens most frequently in conversations related to my work, which makes sense since that's where most of the inputs are sourced.
- newsbinator 5y ago> Once in a while, I think "Wow, how did I come up with something that insightful? When did I ever learn that?" ... and then I look it up and usually realize I was way off :)
- LAIFscratch 5y agoI forget everything I didn't figure out myself. Some books I struggled, looked at the answers, and I can't remember anything I did 5+ years later. Other books/problems I struggled, figured it out myself, and I can recreate that solution like it was yesterday.
- cercatrova 5y agoIsn't this similar to dropout in machine learning neural networks? [0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dilution_(neural_networks) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dilution_(neural_networks)
- renjimen 5y agoDropout is random, rather than learned. But I can see how it could have a similar effect to forgetting.
- karmakaze 5y agoI was thinking something along those lines too. As if a baby starts with a fully connected network of many nodes, then over time experience strengthens some connections as others drop out. If the connections were to return to an evenly connected state everything would have been forgotten, but anything could then be learned as all capacity to learn has returned.
- BearsEatBeats 5y agowould dropout be considered forgetting or learning to use as little information needed to get the right answer?
- jhgb 5y agoI'm reasonably certain that I read very similar things in some writings of Piotr Woźniak on the things he found out while working on SuperMemo. Must have been at least ten years ago.
- honksillet 5y agoIs this really anew theory?
- BearsEatBeats 5y agothat's what i was thinking too. we've known this from neuroscience for a while. i at least remember learning this from at least 5 or more years ago. the general idea being that forgetting is an evolutionary advantage to help consume less conscious memory/processing. but there's always the chance that i'm misinterpreting this particular finding. edit: was going to add another comment, but i've forgotten it now. something about how this is related to what neuroplasticity is. the brain getting rid of connections that aren't being used
- jiggunjer 5y agoThe irony if this was a forgotten theory.
- lvmz 5y agoI read something interesting recently about how most discussion of brain function is 'tainted' by metaphor, these days usually involving computers. Basically the concept was that our brains don't process and store information like a computer does, but because computers come the closest to accomplishing what our brains do it's the easiest point of reference for us when discussing brain function. Since I don't really know anything about brain science and know a little about computer science I find it pretty hard to escape that metaphor and imagine how a brain can function without doing what a computer does. This type of article does give me a bit of an inkling though.
- porknubbins 5y agoI wonder if conversely computer architecture is similar to the brain in at least some macro-structural ways because something about the function of the brain makes it easier for it to design something similar to itself.
- BearsEatBeats 5y agolook into neuromorphic computing
- imwillofficial 5y agoI’m learning so much, including my name every day! Wait, what were we talking about?
- alecst 5y agoMy ex is a linguist, and she used to tell me about the “learning by forgetting” theory of the “phonological inventory” — which is a fancy way of saying “the sounds you can distinguish and produce.” The idea was that children were born able to distinguish all possible sounds, and over time forget the ones they are not exposed to. Interestingly she was a syntactician by training and would tell me that there are many people who believe this is true for syntax too: that children are born with all possible grammars, and “forget” the parts that they’re not exposed to. So if a language expresses parameter X but the child hears ~X, the child “forgets” about X and learns ~X by forgetting. This kind of supposes that a grammar is a set of discrete rules. But I’m not an expert in any of this, for details you’ll need to track down a real linguist.
- tomjakubowski 5y agoInteresting. Is there a correspondence between when a child loses their superhuman ability to learn new languages, and when a child achieves proficiency in the grammar and phonology of their native language?
- basch 5y agoYour comment, along with the article, confirm my biased beliefs that humans are less pattern matching machines than noise filtering machines. Pattern recognition is less about connecting dots than it is distinguishing and purging the unconnected. When that process goes awry, and we can’t discern disconnections, things like psychosis arise. Tangentially, it stimulates a connection to another though that sometimes flares up concerning evolution and specialization. > If memories were gained in circumstances that are not wholly relevant to the current environment, forgetting them can be a positive change that improves our wellbeing. If as a species we evolved and specialized for a certain environment, and now we have changed the environment so much that those specializations are a hindrance, would a past proto human be better at adapting to today’s world, if brought up by modern society, due to better adaptability? Biodiversity is the blank slate beginning, and selection is the forgetting.
- hammock 5y agoWhat also does this mean for psychedelics? Could they "reopen" the filters that were earlier preventing new signals from being found? Something like switching from a digital radio dial (every .2 MHz) to an analog dial (everything in between) - you can find something you had missed before.
- DarylZero 5y agoGood news for me.
- k_sze 5y agoThis reminds me of a funny passage in Jin Yong’s wuxia novel “The Heaven Sword and Dragon Saber”, where Zhang Wuji, the protagonist, learns taichi sword from his grand master Zhang Sanfeng. Zhang Sanfeng demonstrated the whole taichi sword form to Zhang Wuji repeatedly, and after each demonstration, asked Zhang Wuji “how much have you forgotten?” Zhang Wuji instantly got it and each time replied that he has forgotten more and more, while Zhang Wuji’s subordinates watched on the side and became more and more worried that their hierarch was forgetting his martial arts.
- thaumasiotes 5y ago> Jin [...] wuxia [...] Zhang Wuji [...] taichi [...] Zhang [...]. One of these things is not like the others. Why spell "taichi" that way?
- k_sze 5y agoI was typing from a phone and didn't pay attention.
- AussieWog93 5y agoWhy do you feel the need to point out a tiny error when a Chinese person is going to the effort of romanising their own language so that we can all read it?
- thaumasiotes 5y agoIt's unlikely to be an error; no one is going to confuse ji with chi. I wanted to know the thought process. I was expecting something along the lines of "I was using 'taichi' as an English word, not a Chinese word".
- k_sze 5y agoWell, when you put it that way, it's pretty much like you said: "taichi" as an English word. I've always known "taichi" instead of "taiji" in English, even though I know the correct pinyin.
- habitue 5y agoForgetting is similar to regularization mechanisms in deep learning like dropout. You tend to forget details, and this makes your mental models simpler over time. The memories that get refreshed are the details that actually matter and keep tripping you up
- Proven 5y ago
- karmakaze 5y agoAnother reason I think forgetting is so important to continuous learning is that if new ideas conflict with accepted ideas, it will be more difficult to integrate them. Like adding to a map or puzzle where the boundaries don't mesh. So by having fewer deeply held beliefs, new ideas are free to enter and coexist. You can also compartmentalize to some extent like superpositions of possibilities where each one can have new consistent information added without regard to how it conflicts with other possibilities. Not that I have a clue if this is a good example (or advisable) but a physicist could learn both loop quantum gravity and string theory and relate them both to understanding our world and keeping them separate could be helpful for learning.
- eyelidlessness 5y agoMy own experience: I play guitar, I like to think I play very well and lots of people have praised my playing. I do it in bursts, spending lots of time playing and practicing and recording for a stretch of some months then I… don’t play at all. Life makes that cadence happen as much as anything, but all of my significant strides forward in technique and creative breakthrough have come shortly after breaking long dry spells. And that’s not to say there haven’t been disappointing breaks where everything feels cumbersome or fruitless. But all of my noticeable improvements playing have come after a significant stretch of time not playing, even if they were followed by significant time practicing.
- rhapsodic 5y agoI have experienced exactly what you're describing. I want to find out what the minimum effective layoff time is, however, so I can do it deliberately rather than randomly, and hopefully maximize the rate at which my playing progresses.
- eyelidlessness 5y agoI don’t know if it works that way. I vouched for your comment because I think it’s a bummer it was dead, but I can’t say I’ve ever used breaks or falling out of practice as leverage and I don’t think it would be healthy for me to think of it like that. Enjoy taking a break. It’s good for you, or at least necessary when you need to. Be present and grateful when you come back from a break and see improvements. And build on that if you feel like you have the momentum then.
- marttt 5y agoI have experienced something similar in my general learning patterns -- and, being 35+, I don't think this has always been like that. Might well be that information overload etc has actually amplified this kind of impulsive learning sprints ("learning in bursts") for many of us.
- eyelidlessness 5y agoThis definitely shifted for me with age, with (again for me I don’t want to overgeneralize) bigger improvements and bigger gaps as I aged. I don’t think I could seriously describe playing guitar well until I was in my late 20s and couldn’t say it with much confidence until my mid 30s. As far as information overload, it was my late-mid 30s when I was diagnosed with ADHD, and I have a lot of sensory sensitivities. I barely even listen to music right now.
- temp12913231 5y agoThe brain does garbage collection when you sleep. Probably it does an even wider reorganization when you leave some neural circuits unused for some time. Personally, with gaming, I had some improvements coming from restarting a habit but psychologically it is harder to suck more at something and working to get to your former performance. I have seen it in a lot of gamers. They get gud, for some reason they grow tired and leave, they return, they wonder at how out of shape they are, they play a while and leave again when they realize how much they have to work to get to top tier. Ofc I am not referring to games based on the amount of time and money you waste on them, but skill based old school FPS shooters.
- istillwritecode 5y agoThis is a blindingly obvious hypothesis. Assuming the mind has finite hierarchical memory, this is just a matter of purging cache or overwriting other information.
- kaba0 5y agoI find my forgetting pattern similar to a garbage collector — not sure how universal it is, but I tend to forget things I no longer have connections to. Eg. I will quickly forget memories with people I no longer communicate.
- djtango 5y agoMy piano teacher always told me "you learn to skate in the Summer and swim in the Winter" according to the Russians.
- mwattsun 5y ago“the engram – the physical embodiment of a memory” This sounds like a grotesquely inadequate explanation of memory, along the lines of "vapours" “My brain is only a receiver, in the Universe there is a core from which we obtain knowledge, strength and inspiration. I have not penetrated into the secrets of this core, but I know that it exists.” ~ Nikola Tesla I rather like this idea that my brain is a receiver and my memories are stored in the cloud
- ConfusedDog 5y agoI have always been forgetful. I have never thought that was a problem. I often experience same things with repeated “love in first sight” reaction. My friends keep reminding we have done this before and I would not have recollection of that. I seem to have intentionally forgetting certain things just to experience them again, or not overthinking them that would cause any anxiety. That’s why I hate year long lawsuits. I keep have to remember the details until the cases are settled. I want to move into woods to live in peace…