I definitely agree with the notion that property/physical business owners would want good surveillance. I don't see any good coming from LEOs having unregulated

I definitely agree with the notion that property/physical business owners would want good surveillance. I don't see any good coming from LEOs having unregulated access to a facial recognition network that is funded by taxpayers and run by a private nonprofit with special interests. Maybe I'm tripping and quasi-government surveillance entities funded by crypto-millionaires is okay as long as we can stop the looting.