4 ms·

for those with SciAm subs, this June 2020 print article is a profile of the first scientist to encounter Covid. She had spent a decade in caves around China inv

for those with SciAm subs, this June 2020 print article is a profile of the first scientist to encounter Covid. She had spent a decade in caves around China investigating SARS and was therefore called on when early reports of Covid arose. I read this before all the lab leak theories came out, and I'm glad I did because it makes them all seem ridiculous. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/how-chinas-bat-woman-hunted-down-viruses-from-sars-to-the-new-coronavirus1/ https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/how-chinas-bat-wo...

rasz 5y ago
She was "called on" to Wuhan WIV where virus first emerged and where she has been working for at least 7 years and where all of her research was funded by EcoHealth Alliance grants? same EcoHealth Alliance which submitted this gain of function grand proposal in 2018 https://theintercept.com/2021/09/23/coronavirus-research-grant-darpa/ https://theintercept.com/2021/09/23/coronavirus-research-gra... ?
basch 5y ago
More about her. "Also, Dr. Shi was trained by Ralph S. Baric of the University of North Carolina in building “chimera” viruses — taking, for example, the spike protein from a new virus and splicing it to the backbone of a known one like SARS. He invented “no-see-um” techniques that left no trace of the splice." source https://donaldgmcneiljr1954.medium.com/how-i-learned-to-stop-worrying-and-love-the-lab-leak-theory-f4f88446b04d https://donaldgmcneiljr1954.medium.com/how-i-learned-to-stop... https://www.researchgate.net/publication/8119695_Development_of_mouse_hepatitis_virus_and_SARS-CoV_infectious_cDNA_constructs https://www.researchgate.net/publication/8119695_Development...
- akiselev 5y ago
  > the spike protein from a new virus and splicing it to the backbone of a known one like SARS The spike protein was already a defining feature of SARS-CoV when it emerged and became "known" [1]. That's why it was classified as a coronavirus! [2] Edit: Appears I have misread, see reply [1] https://www.science.org/doi/abs/10.1126/science.1086418 https://www.science.org/doi/abs/10.1126/science.1086418 [2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coronavirus#Structure https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coronavirus#Structure
  - basch 5y ago
    I dont fully follow what you are saying. The statement was about grafting a new spike in place of an old one. Where is it implied that SARS doesnt have a spike? I dont even think that is the important takeaway. The no-see-um editing technique can apply to more than just spike proteins. I dont think its being implied that thats what happened.

rasz 5y ago

She was "called on" to Wuhan WIV where virus first emerged and where she has been working for at least 7 years and where all of her research was funded by EcoHealth Alliance grants? same EcoHealth Alliance which submitted this gain of function grand proposal in 2018 https://theintercept.com/2021/09/23/coronavirus-research-grant-darpa/ https://theintercept.com/2021/09/23/coronavirus-research-gra... ?

basch 5y ago

More about her. "Also, Dr. Shi was trained by Ralph S. Baric of the University of North Carolina in building “chimera” viruses — taking, for example, the spike protein from a new virus and splicing it to the backbone of a known one like SARS. He invented “no-see-um” techniques that left no trace of the splice." source https://donaldgmcneiljr1954.medium.com/how-i-learned-to-stop-worrying-and-love-the-lab-leak-theory-f4f88446b04d https://donaldgmcneiljr1954.medium.com/how-i-learned-to-stop... https://www.researchgate.net/publication/8119695_Development_of_mouse_hepatitis_virus_and_SARS-CoV_infectious_cDNA_constructs https://www.researchgate.net/publication/8119695_Development...

akiselev 5y ago
> the spike protein from a new virus and splicing it to the backbone of a known one like SARS The spike protein was already a defining feature of SARS-CoV when it emerged and became "known" [1]. That's why it was classified as a coronavirus! [2] Edit: Appears I have misread, see reply [1] https://www.science.org/doi/abs/10.1126/science.1086418 https://www.science.org/doi/abs/10.1126/science.1086418 [2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coronavirus#Structure https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coronavirus#Structure
- basch 5y ago
  I dont fully follow what you are saying. The statement was about grafting a new spike in place of an old one. Where is it implied that SARS doesnt have a spike? I dont even think that is the important takeaway. The no-see-um editing technique can apply to more than just spike proteins. I dont think its being implied that thats what happened.