"Child" is common parlance for pediatric, a teenager is both a child and pediatric, and the pediatric covid death number includes teens. Also, you keep not addr

"Child" is common parlance for pediatric, a teenager is both a child and pediatric, and the pediatric covid death number includes teens. Also, you keep not addressing why it’s safe or scientifically credible for the FDA to break long-standing vaccine approval processes. The cited CDC source document said they certified a new covid test because it unlike the decertified one can distinguish influenza from covid. Sometimes I ask myself if the FDA and CDC credibility died with covid, or because of covid. Likewise with my fellow acadmics that has failed to defend the scientific method and instead defend "Science" administrative institutional processes even after obvious corruption that make them unscientific. To make matters worse administrative institutional representatives often obviously misrepresent the core document, contributing to misinformation for political aims and profit. E.g. making it seem like approved vaxx is injected while approval doc reissue Emergency Use Authorization that has a liability shield and only EUA vaxx is injected (see FDA approval page 3 [1]). People that defend health and science organizations that break the scientific method as well as best practices, all while having revolving doors with those they regulate, are enablers. It's like living in a house infected with termites with people that ignore the signs. Without you guys defending them in forums like this their bullshit would be much harder to pull off, and we could have nice things such as a healthy scientific discourse and probably many fewer covid deaths. Many like myself will pry science back out of "Science" hands, because it's annoying to get political answers to scientific questions. [1] https://www.fda.gov/media/150386/download https://www.fda.gov/media/150386/download