3 ms·
> You hear this "learn the fundamentals first" so many times and it really bothers me as I don't think it's great advice Exactly. This is also why we don't tea
by linkdd 5y ago
> You hear this "learn the fundamentals first" so many times and it really bothers me as I don't think it's great advice
Exactly. This is also why we don't teach ZFC set theory to 5 years old. We start with "1 + 1 = 2".
When they learn functions, like sqrt, we don't tell them about imaginary numbers.
This is true for ANY subject. You start at the surface, and you dig deeper. Analogies made at the beginning will help you make a mental visualisation of what happens. 99% of the time, those analogies are just false, and that's ok.
Imagine teaching to a 10 years old about quantum mechanics because it's wrong to say that the universe is made of many tiny balls...
- codeptualize 5y agoTrue. After sort of skimming the article again I think it would be better without the order argument, basically just promote digging deeper at some point. I fully agree with that and there are some great arguments in the article towards that.