5 ms·
Is that the common way you'd express that they were measured in free fall -- that the effects were "filtered" out? That seems like an odd way of saying it, but
by kenjackson 5y ago
Is that the common way you'd express that they were measured in free fall -- that the effects were "filtered" out? That seems like an odd way of saying it, but I'm not a physicist.
- pdonis 5y agoI don't think it's a very good way of expressing that the objects were in free fall, no. Nor, as far as I can tell, does the actual paper (as opposed to the pop science article) use such an expression.