3 ms·

Sounds like you haven’t seen much evidence then. https://www.cnn.com/2022/01/13/politics/oath-keepers-sedition-takeaways/index.html https://www.cnn.com/2022/01/

• gjsman-1000 5y ago
  In that case, I am still not convinced, because how many people have ever heard of the Oath Keepers? To me, from what I can tell, this means that there was a bunch of people protesting there, as was their legal right. A very small group had plans to break in, and unexpectedly succeeded in doing so. Everyone else then followed even though this hadn't been pre-planned. So, from Facebook's perspective, you would have to censor at the level of squashing ants to have prevented this. Again, this is just from what I can see though and could be proven wrong.
  • IgorPartola 5y ago
    Literally none of this is about censorship. I know it’s inconvenient but you have to read the actual articles posted, not just the headlines. I have heard of them and I am nowhere near those circles or even the news sites all that much. They are a rather infamous org (that’s not a good thing). It sounds like you keep moving the goal posts (“I have not seen any evidence… ok I have seen the evidence but it’s not good enough evidence… ok there is evidence but it wasn’t enough people…”) so I am not going to keep replying but I urge you to read first, post second.
• satronaut 5y ago