3 ms·
Attrition usually loses the top-performers because they can get much better offers. The poor-performers don't have any good options to leave. Proactive manage
by grayfaced 5y ago
Attrition usually loses the top-performers because they can get much better offers. The poor-performers don't have any good options to leave.
Proactive management would reward the top performers and reprimand/fire the poor performers. That's the opposite of attrition.
- soheil 5y agoWait so according to your model of the world top-performers become idiots in their next job? Where are all these top-performers who do get compensated enough and what companies do they work for that have no attrition?
- ozim 5y agoWorld is much bigger than you can imagine. If you hop jobs every 2 years in 30 years it is only 15 companies. I have something like 10 years of experience and was working or collaborating already with something between 10 and 13 companies.