The original article Irish Times articles is not even available without a paywall, yet it is quoted by the topic of this argument without further evidence. Gre

The original article Irish Times articles is not even available without a paywall, yet it is quoted by the topic of this argument without further evidence. Great claims require, great evidence, especially on such a delicate topic. If a household scientific name will be judged as pedophile, so be it! But please, get historians and primary source evidence; not a newspaper article behind a paywal. The sentence you quote is from Joe Humphreys[1] a journalist for the Irish Times itself. I could not find any biography or peer reviews work on Schrodinger by him[1]. Again it is not about whether it is not true or not. The whole article makes a lot of claims which touch very sensitive topics that should be accurately and precisely described with at least mention of original sources or authorities. Unfortunately it seems we have Joe Humphreys' word :( https://joehumphreys.com/about/ https://joehumphreys.com/about/