I'm not feeling "attacked". I'm trying to help you understand that the argument "feature X might be used in a way that could lead to a incorrect behavior" on it

I'm not feeling "attacked". I'm trying to help you understand that the argument "feature X might be used in a way that could lead to a incorrect behavior" on its own isn't enough to warrant exclusion of that feature, because that same argument can be used against basically all features of a language.