4 ms·
He was a monster. Yeah, and it's even in a section of the website called "Big Yikes". Ok I get, pedophilia == bad. But my, aren't we being slowly trained to
by vanusa 5y ago
He was a monster.
Yeah, and it's even in a section of the website called "Big Yikes". Ok I get, pedophilia == bad.
But my, aren't we being slowly trained to be hapless outrage porn junkies these days, by the continual barrage of manipulative trigger-articles like these.
- vagrantJin 5y agoYou're right. We are being manipulated. I make the claim that rational thought evaporates completely when sex and/or sexuality in any form is the basis of public discourse.
- alephxyz 5y agoIf you want a more "sober" version, here's the relevant section from the Wikipedia article on him : >Schrödinger repeatedly sexually abused young women. "The poor things," Schrödinger wrote about the young women and girls he had sexually abused. "They have given me the moments of happiness in my life and themselves the sorrow. Such is life." Schrödinger recorded his sexual "conquests" in a diary he called "Ephemeridae" (mayflies). He justified his preference for young girls by saying that their innocence was the ideal counterpart to his natural genius. One of his victims, aged between 12 and 17, became pregnant by him, had an abortion and became infertile after the abortion. These acts of abuse were reported in 1989 by Walter J. Moore (1918-2001) in his biography of Schrödinger as a "lolita complex", and described by John Gribbin in his 2012 book as "fondling and cuddling".