2 ms·

Good catch, problem is what are the citations: [42] https://taz.de/Missbrauch-und-Missachtung/!5823374/ https://taz.de/Missbrauch-und-Missachtung/!5823374/ [4

Good catch, problem is what are the citations: [42] https://taz.de/Missbrauch-und-Missachtung/!5823374/ https://taz.de/Missbrauch-und-Missachtung/!5823374/ [43] Joe Humphreys (11 December 2021). "How Erwin Schrödinger indulged his 'Lolita complex' in Ireland". The Irish Times. [44] staff (January 2022). "Turns Out Schrödinger, the Father of Quantum Physics, Was a Pedophile". Futurism. Retrieved 14 January 2022. [45] Johnson, Lacy M. (2 August 2021). "Chanda Prescod-Weinstein: "I'm one part of the universe, trying to figure out another part of the universe."". Guernica Magazine. Retrieved 14 January 2021. [42] An article referring to the Irish times article. [43] is the Irish times original article i called sensationalist, due to the conflation of 14 to 17 sexual affairs being called pedophilie. [44] Is the a re-quote of the article of [43] [45] Is an interview with a third party account with the following to say: " I can’t remember exactly how he says it, but it’s something like “an unusual interest in pre-teenage girls,” which is new information for me. Literally, 90 percent of the work that I do right now is using the nonlinear Schrödinger-Poisson equation.? " . What’s interesting to me about this is nobody’s going to write about Rovelli’s book and call it a memoir unless that’s what I decide to say in my review. Nobody’s going to call it a biography of Schrödinger. I might say it’s a biography of quantum mechanics, but nobody’s going to say it’s a biography of a person, nobody’s going to say it’s a memoir, nobody’s going to say it’s an autobiography, none of that."

eesmith 5y ago
Yes, many of them go back to the same primary source. But the [42] you mention seems entirely on point, eg, with 'That was a mistake, Humphreys admitted three weeks ago: "The evidence was obvious," he wrote. "Schrödinger was a serial abuser." ' That's certainly enough to suspect that this is not meant to interpret a cultural difference in the age of consent as pedophilia, but is actually the "the evilness of a terrible thing" you opposed. I don't know why you thought it was more likely the former.
- ptsneves 5y ago
  The original article Irish Times articles is not even available without a paywall, yet it is quoted by the topic of this argument without further evidence. Great claims require, great evidence, especially on such a delicate topic. If a household scientific name will be judged as pedophile, so be it! But please, get historians and primary source evidence; not a newspaper article behind a paywal. The sentence you quote is from Joe Humphreys[1] a journalist for the Irish Times itself. I could not find any biography or peer reviews work on Schrodinger by him[1]. Again it is not about whether it is not true or not. The whole article makes a lot of claims which touch very sensitive topics that should be accurately and precisely described with at least mention of original sources or authorities. Unfortunately it seems we have Joe Humphreys' word :( https://joehumphreys.com/about/ https://joehumphreys.com/about/
  - eesmith 5y ago
    > especially on such a delicate topic Which is why jumping to the hypothesis that it was an age-of-consent issue is surely premature.

eesmith 5y ago

Yes, many of them go back to the same primary source. But the [42] you mention seems entirely on point, eg, with 'That was a mistake, Humphreys admitted three weeks ago: "The evidence was obvious," he wrote. "Schrödinger was a serial abuser." ' That's certainly enough to suspect that this is not meant to interpret a cultural difference in the age of consent as pedophilia, but is actually the "the evilness of a terrible thing" you opposed. I don't know why you thought it was more likely the former.

ptsneves 5y ago
The original article Irish Times articles is not even available without a paywall, yet it is quoted by the topic of this argument without further evidence. Great claims require, great evidence, especially on such a delicate topic. If a household scientific name will be judged as pedophile, so be it! But please, get historians and primary source evidence; not a newspaper article behind a paywal. The sentence you quote is from Joe Humphreys[1] a journalist for the Irish Times itself. I could not find any biography or peer reviews work on Schrodinger by him[1]. Again it is not about whether it is not true or not. The whole article makes a lot of claims which touch very sensitive topics that should be accurately and precisely described with at least mention of original sources or authorities. Unfortunately it seems we have Joe Humphreys' word :( https://joehumphreys.com/about/ https://joehumphreys.com/about/
- eesmith 5y ago
  > especially on such a delicate topic Which is why jumping to the hypothesis that it was an age-of-consent issue is surely premature.