4 ms·

Which you will find by looking at the income data, or any news article that covers income stagnation if you want the distilled version for easier reading.

endisneigh 5y ago
Why don’t you post the data you’re referring to so we’re on the same page? Something tells me you won’t show any that supports the quoted assertion. By the way the quoted assertion has nothing to do with income stagnation. > However, over time, those in similar standing seem to end up making the same amount of money no matter what.
- randomdata 5y ago
  > Why don’t you post the data you’re referring to so we’re on the same page? Like, you want me to link to it? I wouldn't know the URL off the top of my head. That is an oddly specific thing to memorize. > Something tells me you won’t show any that supports the quoted assertion. No doubt. You can tell someone is just looking for a fake argument when they start asking for someone to have memorized an arbitrary URL that is likely a deep path structure and not reasonably memorizable. > By the way the quoted assertion has nothing to do with income stagnation. Especially when they think they have it all figured out, free of misinterpretation. The intent of what I said has everything to do with income stagnation. If you have interpreted it differently, I'm not sure what to tell ya.
  - endisneigh 5y ago
    Lol ok - so you got nothing. A shame I was interested in reading. Thanks for clarifying.
    - randomdata 5y ago
      I do not have URLs memorized, no. If you are legitimately interested in reading, you can easily find what you are looking for on Google, I'm sure.
      - endisneigh 5y ago
        No time to waste looking up claims other people made unfortunately - especially when I don’t believe then to begin with. Good luck. Feel free to find the link for me and edit the post though if it’s legit.
        deleted 5y ago
        [deleted]
        randomdata 5y ago
        Should I be concerned that you don't believe me? You've mentioned that a couple of times. I guess I'm not clear on what value you are trying to add to the discussion.

endisneigh 5y ago

Why don’t you post the data you’re referring to so we’re on the same page? Something tells me you won’t show any that supports the quoted assertion. By the way the quoted assertion has nothing to do with income stagnation. > However, over time, those in similar standing seem to end up making the same amount of money no matter what.

randomdata 5y ago
> Why don’t you post the data you’re referring to so we’re on the same page? Like, you want me to link to it? I wouldn't know the URL off the top of my head. That is an oddly specific thing to memorize. > Something tells me you won’t show any that supports the quoted assertion. No doubt. You can tell someone is just looking for a fake argument when they start asking for someone to have memorized an arbitrary URL that is likely a deep path structure and not reasonably memorizable. > By the way the quoted assertion has nothing to do with income stagnation. Especially when they think they have it all figured out, free of misinterpretation. The intent of what I said has everything to do with income stagnation. If you have interpreted it differently, I'm not sure what to tell ya.
- endisneigh 5y ago
  Lol ok - so you got nothing. A shame I was interested in reading. Thanks for clarifying.
  - randomdata 5y ago
    I do not have URLs memorized, no. If you are legitimately interested in reading, you can easily find what you are looking for on Google, I'm sure.
    - endisneigh 5y ago
      No time to waste looking up claims other people made unfortunately - especially when I don’t believe then to begin with. Good luck. Feel free to find the link for me and edit the post though if it’s legit.
      - deleted 5y ago
        [deleted]
      - randomdata 5y ago
        Should I be concerned that you don't believe me? You've mentioned that a couple of times. I guess I'm not clear on what value you are trying to add to the discussion.