2 ms·
Can confirm. I personally look at any paper without code with great suspicion. The reviewers certainly did not try to reproduce your results, and I have no gua
by _aavaa_ 5y ago
Can confirm.
I personally look at any paper without code with great suspicion. The reviewers certainly did not try to reproduce your results, and I have no guarantee that a paper without code has enough information for me to reproduce.
I always go for the papers with code provided.
- erwincoumans 5y agoAgreed, reproducibility helps a lot, and it is very easy to get details wrong when reimplementing. Having the source code is a bit plus.
- petschge 5y agoAs a reviewer I have reproduced results with my own independent plasma simulation code. And I have had a reviewer write in a report about my paper "result X seemed strange, but I ran it with my code and it does it too. I don't know why, but the results is valid". In my opinion that is even better than just rerunning the same code.