3 ms·

The convention post WW2 was that the borders in Europe stay where they are, otherwise there is no end unfurling that. AFAIK Romanian-Ukrainian border is not con

by varjag 5y ago

The convention post WW2 was that the borders in Europe stay where they are, otherwise there is no end unfurling that. AFAIK Romanian-Ukrainian border is not contested.

deleted 5y ago
[deleted]
paganel 5y ago
Well, de facto that convention wasn't respected, see Yugoslavia. Also, Ukraine did get something from us even after WW2 [1] I agree about the unfurling part, I was just trying to point out that the Ukrainian state crying about "the big bad Russian wolf" when that bad wolf is a major reason behind their actual foundation as a State is a bit hypocritical. Even more so when the Ukrainian state expects us, their neighbours, to join in in their battles against the Russians. [1] https://ro.wikipedia.org/wiki/Insula_%C8%98erpilor https://ro.wikipedia.org/wiki/Insula_%C8%98erpilor
- throwaway48292 5y ago
  If you agree about the unfurling, what you do want them to do?
  - paganel 5y ago
    Resolve their conflicts locally, don’t drag me into a war for your cause.
    - varjag 5y ago
      I had a teacher who used to expel both bully and their victim out of classroom to keep it orderly.
- varjag 5y ago
  I don't think any neighbouring state has annexed anything of Yugoslavia. > Even more so when the Ukrainian state expects us, their neighbours, to join in in their battles against the Russians. Got in to NATO, raise up the ladder!