> Rust's unsafe wouldn't have done anything to protect against an hypotetical log4r. You are correct. No programming language will protect you from writing fla

> Rust's unsafe wouldn't have done anything to protect against an hypotetical log4r. You are correct. No programming language will protect you from writing flawed application logic. > pity that they are using a C GUI library. (...) Gtk version update, even minor ones might break the assumptions I don't know about that. GTK is more "battletested" than most frameworks, and has a lot of contributors to fix bugs. Also, and that's a very important point, GTK cares for accessibility! Using any other framework would have meant excluding a lot of people from the GUI. As for assumptions, i certainly hope GTK devs don't push breaking changes to the ABI on minor updates. But i guess that's yet another assumption that can be broken.