>but I've not once seen a citation of any of them I have, which is why I brought it up. Any time people throw out such absurdly high numbers and provide "evide

>but I've not once seen a citation of any of them I have, which is why I brought it up. Any time people throw out such absurdly high numbers and provide "evidence" there always is "...seeking paternity testing..." in the methodology. Always. It's absurd how people could overlook this, it's like if you counted the times Maury Povich says "you are not the father" and used it to say anything about the general population.