3 ms·
> Would the author be willing to enter a bet where I wager $1 and win a billion dollars (since it has positive expected value for a "certain" event)? Looking a
by pawelmurias 5y ago
> Would the author be willing to enter a bet where I wager $1 and win a billion dollars (since it has positive expected value for a "certain" event)?
Looking at other post the author is either a troll or mentally insane and plans to build fancy perpetual motion machines.
https://medium.com/@RebelScience/the-simple-reason-that-we-are-swimming-in-energy-8cd59cd71476 https://medium.com/@RebelScience/the-simple-reason-that-we-a...
- throwaway946513 5y agoFrom the link - "Isaac Newton had a cause for acceleration (force) but none for inertia." Funny, because physics explains that all objects of mass have inertia. Heavy objects traveling at speed have inertia. Faster speeds? More Inertia. Heavier objects? More inertia, and we can calculate inertia : I = mr2. I doubt that this author has any credibility for anything related to physics.
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]