3 ms·
As you say, we now know that each standard L-function satisfies a subconvex estimate as its argument varies. This falls short of "solving the subconvexity prob
by CrushItNerds519 5y ago
As you say, we now know that each standard L-function satisfies a subconvex estimate as its argument varies. This falls short of "solving the subconvexity problem" in two respects.
The first, pointed out already by gavagai691, is that it is not known that "every L-function" is "standard" (this is a major open problem in the Langlands program).
The second is that the general "subconvexity problem" asks for a nontrivial estimate not only for each fixed L-function as its argument varies, but more generally as the L-function itself varies. The general case of the problem remains open.