4 ms·
It doesn't have to be the lock that's secured. What about a hinge mechanism which takes a programmable amount of time to open the container door? If it takes 10
by Ansil849 5y ago
It doesn't have to be the lock that's secured. What about a hinge mechanism which takes a programmable amount of time to open the container door? If it takes 10 minutes for the door to open, the lock doesn't matter as much, since the thieves have a very limited amount of time before the trains start moving again, apparently.
- asdff 5y agoWay too complicated. Apparently shippers are opting to start just welding the door shut and unwelding it at the destination.
- dkdbejwi383 5y agoThat sounds like it could be quite error prone. If it's electronic, what about power failures? If mechanical, sounds like lots of intricate machined parts which will wear down over time.
- Ansil849 5y agoTime locks have been around for more than 100 years, I'm pretty confident that if something like this was desired by the powers that be, it would have been implemented. What I'm assuming is stopping it aren't the engineering challenges, but the fact that currently it's cheaper to let the thefts happen than it is to mitigate them.
- dkdbejwi383 5y agoI wonder what the cost of engineering secure containers would be vs. addressing the societal problems in the USA that lead to situations like this would be.
- unclekev 5y agoI guess you could apply some of the same solutions used in refrigerated shipping containers for power redundancy.
- ce4 5y agoThose are standardized containers standardized which are made in the millions as cheap as possible. That stuff needs to work, think of all the means of transport where it is used (vessels, trains, aircraft), be accessible for inspections (customs) and so on. The costs to secure and upgrade the containers for the whole system is probably a lot higher than accepting a small percentage of stolen parcel.