> We've seen this in quantum physics, where things like string theory are on the edge of testability I mean... Quantum theory itself has actually given lots of

> We've seen this in quantum physics, where things like string theory are on the edge of testability I mean... Quantum theory itself has actually given lots of solid predictions. They are statistical in nature, sure, but easily testable, and some can even be done at home (stuff involving polarized light filters). String theory... Is just math that works out. I don't even know if it predicts anything. However it's certainly more complex than to allow us to say "we've seen this in quantum physics" without a PhD in the field. Honestly, I find the article superficial. A cute but ultimately shallow idea looking for arguments to support it.