4 ms·
Legally speaking, that isn't true (at least not in the US). Vaccine mandates (in general, regardless of today's SCOTUS decision) remain constitutional: https:/
by jasonhansel 5y ago
Legally speaking, that isn't true (at least not in the US).
Vaccine mandates (in general, regardless of today's SCOTUS decision) remain constitutional: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jacobson_v._Massachusetts https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jacobson_v._Massachusetts
In fact, you are perfectly within your rights to elect a state government that requires vaccination for all citizens.
- agensaequivocum 5y agoThat case is only in reference to state government not federal. No where in the constitution does the federal government receive any kind of power remotely close to that. If my state enacted a mandate, I would move immediately. While I may agree that in some cases that the state has the right to do force one, it would only be in an extremely rare, last resort, literally everyone will die case. The government should always err on the side of liberty.