3 ms·
No. They are trying to use a vaccine to solve the problem and this is wrong because the virus is not the root cause of harm. Even if they did manage somehow to
by supperburg 5y ago
No. They are trying to use a vaccine to solve the problem and this is wrong because the virus is not the root cause of harm. Even if they did manage somehow to prevent the virus from getting in, which the vaccine will fail at, it wouldn’t matter because this same kind of immune dysfunction is at the center of a million other diseases. A treatment that controls the immune system wipes them all out in one stroke. But people are stuck on yesterdays thinking
- kretor 5y agoFrom the article: "In this cohort, the risk of MS increased 32-fold after infection with EBV but was unchanged after infection with other viruses."
- Zerverus 5y agoThat’s a lot of wild claims without any substantiation. The bar at HN surely is higher than this.
- MauroIksem 5y agoIt's not.
- supperburg 5y agoIt’s not so wild. Inflammation is very ancient and it does a lot more than make a paper cut turn red. It pulls lots of fundamental levers, metabolic levers. Inflammatory signals are one of the great frontiers of medicine. We have barely scraped the surface of it.
- Zerverus 5y agoThat’s the opposite of substantiating. Hand waving ‘it’s the early days’ commentary Now where have we seen this before…