This post should be retitled to "11 mm in 1.25 nanoseconds", the blog post has been renamed to that as per this update: "...So the 5.5 mm actually only takes 0

This post should be retitled to "11 mm in 1.25 nanoseconds", the blog post has been renamed to that as per this update: "...So the 5.5 mm actually only takes 0.625 nanoseconds each way, the signal actually goes 11 mm in 1.25 nanoseconds, so the original title of this blog post is a lie. Sorry!"