3 ms·
I can understand why hotfile wouldn't be able to double-check. But you'd think they could at least put a CAPTCHA on the takedown request, so that an RIAA bot ca
by CWuestefeld 15y ago
I can understand why hotfile wouldn't be able to double-check. But you'd think they could at least put a CAPTCHA on the takedown request, so that an RIAA bot can't rip off a million complaints.
- sp332 15y agoNope, any request that fulfills DMCA requirements has to be obeyed. Any exceptions risks losing safe harbor, and that means you're responsible for all content on your servers.
- bediger 15y agoYou're responsible for all content, if you blink at one DMCA takedown? I dunno, that seems a bit extreme. Is this for real, or is this just a lawyerly, overly cautious opinion? Are there cases where this has happened? Does the DMCA itself have wording to this effect?
- sp332 15y agoNormally, you would have to take responsibility for the data on your servers. Legally, there is an exception if you disclaim responsibility for all user-generated content, then you just take the content down and whoever has a problem has to work it out with the user directly. This exception is known as "safe harbor", and there are very specific rules about who gets to claim it. https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/Online_Copyright_Infringement_Liability_Limitation_Act#Safe_Harbor_Provision_for_Online_Storage_-_.C2.A7_512.28c.29 https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/Online_Copyri... Basically, as soon as you take responsibility for any of the user-generated content, you can be held liable for all of it. Either you're responsible for the content on your servers or you're not, you can't really pick and choose.