The position of Schrems/NOYB, as far as I understand it, is that using a cloud service potentially subject to US law, irrespective of where the servers are actu

The position of Schrems/NOYB, as far as I understand it, is that using a cloud service potentially subject to US law, irrespective of where the servers are actually located, is inconsistent with the GDPR. He basically says the same thing in the linked article: "The bottom line is: companies can't use US cloud services in Europe anymore. It has now been 1.5 years since the Court of Justice confirmed this a second time, so it is more than time that the law is also enforced."