> It is an easy way to understand the depth of the intellect you are speaking with Sorry but no. An algorithm that, for a given prompt, finds and returns the s

> It is an easy way to understand the depth of the intellect you are speaking with Sorry but no. An algorithm that, for a given prompt, finds and returns the semantically closest quote from a selection of 30 philosophers may sound very wise but is actually dumb as bricks. GPT-3 is obviously a bit more than that, but "depth of intellect" is not what you are measuring with chat prompts. > Plus the answer "Yes, I always lie" is obviously a lie and proves that it is capable of contradicting itself even within the confines of one answer. Contradicting yourself is not a feat if you don't have any concept of truth in the first place.