4 ms·
I also did remote for a long time before Covid, and I noticed the industry moving towards accepting remote in sort-of lurches. First it was OK for exceptional
by biztos 5y ago
I also did remote for a long time before Covid, and I noticed the industry moving towards accepting remote in sort-of lurches.
First it was OK for exceptional cases where the person was really important or had some medical-ish rationale. Then ten years later all those remotes were "normalized" and people got home-office subsidies. Then Covid hit and it was WFH everybody temporarily. Then Covid obviously wasn't going away maybe ever, and it was "hybrid" which I read as "manager decides." Now the workforce is making demands and we'll see where that leads.
(Ironically enough I turned down a job last year because it was on-site and would require a move, and then Covid didn't go away and they closed that office and put everyone on remote.)
I believe it was Andreessen who said over and over again that proximity is a competitive advantage and thus startups will always favor it and by extension so will the Valley. I don't even disagree with the premise, but it sure looks like people are going to "route around" that advantage in order to capture other advantages for the foreseeable (forever-Covid?) future.
- bluGill 5y agoThe question (that I cannot answer) is will companies find ways to work full remote. Hallways and lunchroom accidental meetings are where a lot of things get discussed. I don't believe hybrid with some full remote some not can work. You can do everyone in the office on specific days (M-F, or only Tuesday...), but I don't think a mix can work.