> If you mean, a choice by the team making the movie thats art darling! exaggerated arm movements I kid, but agree completely. > not even about a genuine vis

> If you mean, a choice by the team making the movie thats art darling! exaggerated arm movements I kid, but agree completely. > not even about a genuine vision from the director, but rather following the fad. I once heard about a monthly, where the exec producer's current shag was spit balling changes, expensive changes. It was great to see the faces of the VFX producer mentally totting up the cost. Also when filming the prince of persia, the production team realised that they had a massive plot hole linking two parts of the movie, so they asked the VFX company to figure something out. From what I recall, this is the origin of this scene: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yfVu52tZxd0 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yfVu52tZxd0 In clash of the titans(remake), they spent a boat load of cash on a real set for mount olympus, but then decided that they wanted to make it more "google maps-y" so scrapped it and redid it in VFX. Some films are Art, others less so. None of them are as artistic as film theory dictates.