The other thing that tickled me was (this is from the Forbes article): "A 17-year-old student who cannot be named for legal reasons" Yeah, I appreciate why th

The other thing that tickled me was (this is from the Forbes article): "A 17-year-old student who cannot be named for legal reasons" Yeah, I appreciate why that is and why it makes sense, but it doesn't make it any less ironic that somebody from 'Anonymous' can't be named in the coverage of this case.