4 ms·
Definitely not. Total comp of senior engineers at Microsoft in Seattle is nowhere near this. (I am one of those at this point in time)
by verst 5y ago
Definitely not. Total comp of senior engineers at Microsoft in Seattle is nowhere near this. (I am one of those at this point in time)
- dastbe 5y agoIt is an unfortunate truth that Microsoft's pay between entry level to somewhere around principal is not competitive with a substantial number of companies. That is not to say that Microsoft doesn't provide other benefits, but top tier compensation is not one of them.
- verst 5y agoI don't mind. When I look at the vast majority of software engineering jobs out there even Microsoft compensation is good, and perfectly fine for Seattle. I used to work at Google too (in Mountain View). Believe it or not I liked working at Google and I also like working at Microsoft. I don't need to chase top tier compensation. I just do things I enjoy where I'm learning and my career can progress. Right now I'm mostly writing in Go working on an OSS project managed by the Cloud Native Compute Foundation. As an aside, early retirement is not a goal of mine.
- dastbe 5y agoto be clear i don't think you should mind if comp-maximization isn't your sole focus now (or ever).
- lhorie 5y agoThe point that kinda got lost here is that outside of the big tech circles, equity packages are basically non-existent. So, whereas in, say, Google Canada, you might make CAD 150k salary + 100k equity, in CGI[0], you might only make a CAD 120k salary with no equity grant for a similar level of seniority. [0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CGI_Inc https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CGI_Inc.