4 ms·
> The results, which are not peer reviewed, have been posted on the preprint server Research Square It's a CCP propaganda piece. I find that "study" pretty fis
by hunterb123 5y ago
> The results, which are not peer reviewed, have been posted on the preprint server Research Square
It's a CCP propaganda piece. I find that "study" pretty fishy, the results would have been easy to verify if true.
Same as the CDC study they tried to use against Israel's study for natural immunity.
- mrtesthah 5y agoOnce you let ideology infiltrate your reasoning, you’re no longer doing science. Just because you don’t like the implications of a particular piece of research doesn’t mean you get to dismiss it.
- hunterb123 5y agoThat's not what I said. I said it should be easy to peer review but it hasn't been. That's a very common ask especially among HN, is it not? https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=true&query=peer%20review&sort=byPopularity&type=comment https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=true&que... From my perspective it looks dubious and the only goal is to shift attention away from the RatG13 sample.