I just took a look at the complaint, and looks like I was wrong! They claimed such things were copied, and so I assumed an actual ripping; as that's common. Bu

I just took a look at the complaint, and looks like I was wrong! They claimed such things were copied, and so I assumed an actual ripping; as that's common. But in the complaint it appears that they mean a more traditional copying by recreating a facsimile. That's greyer. It'll be up to the court to decide if it's flagrant enough of a duplicate to warrant damages.