If I understand it correctly, it's suggesting that a user of /r/poor is 118 times as likely to comment on /r/btc than the average user. I don't think the crypto

If I understand it correctly, it's suggesting that a user of /r/poor is 118 times as likely to comment on /r/btc than the average user. I don't think the crypto subs being large has any significance whatsoever. If anything it just strengthens the signal when you're looking at it in that direction. Reversing the direction doesn't mean much. It just means that users of crypto subs have stronger links elsewhere, like to investing. If you were going to try to draw a really big conclusion from this (you shouldn't) it would be something like "a large portion of those who are poor are involving themselves with crypto," not like "being into crypto will make you poor."